
Semprius, a startup company manufacturing tiny concentrated solar cells that forgo any cooling systems has achieved a truly amazing leap in solar cell efficiency. The company was able to hit 33.9 percent efficiency with their solar panel, the first time a commercially-viable solar technology has passed the one-third mark.
Semprius's solar cells use gallium arsenide, rather than silicon, which is able to absorb sunlight and dissipate heat far better. The solar panel that scored this major efficiency record is made up of hundreds of these tiny cells that are about the width of a pen-drawn line. Lenses atop the cells concentrate sunlight 1,000 times.
To capture a better chunk of the solar spectrum, Semprius uses three layers of gallium arsenide, each one tweaked to convert a different part of the spectrum into electricity. Silicon solar cells, by contrast, only absorb a narrow band of sunlight and have efficiency rates that typically fall somewhere in the sub-15 percent area. The record for silicon cell efficiency is 22.9 percent and the previous record for commercial-level solar technology was 32 percent.
Possibly the greatest thing about the Semprius solar panel is that it's not some far distant future technology. It's been designed to be commercially produced and a factory opens this summer to start manufacturing the cells.
via MIT Tech Review

written by recycling electronics, February 08, 2012
written by Guest, February 08, 2012
written by Charlie, February 08, 2012
@recycling, perhaps you are right, but I gather the problem is also heat and the ability of the semiconductor (silicon, gallium arsenide) to react to various wavelengths at various temperatures. Also, as @sarah mentioned, it's about the material cost and silicon is fairly cheap and abundant. So I'm not sure it's about the capturing of the 'wasted' light energy as much as the combination of cheap semiconductor, heat dissipation and performance at that temperature.
So, I'm guessing this semiconductor costs a mint which is why they have concentrating lens arrays to cut down on the area of semiconductor needed... Prices please!
written by Charlotte Roofing Contractor, February 09, 2012
written by R K Roy, February 09, 2012
Thanks
R K Roy
written by Cees Timmerman, February 26, 2012
But if you're gonna mount them in the yard, i'd go for the "Industry highest combined efficiency of >72%": http://www.zenithsolar.com/product.aspx?id=287
written by Peter, March 07, 2012
This CPV panels use lenses to concentrate the light unto the transducer. Such panels must be perpendicular to the sun position throughout the day. So they need 2-axis sun tracking systems so the light falls correctly into the lensing system.
So, you may want to do this on the ground.
written by Peter, March 11, 2012
The Zenithsolar unit that you mentioned has a weight of 3000 lbs. I bet you that is super expensive. Also, it would problably make more sense to generate hot water for a home with a cheaper roof mounted solar heat exchanger system.
written by Robert, March 22, 2012
http://www.secretsearchenginelabs.com/information/1166301-Robert-P--Pryor--PE--LS--LEED---Professional
written by california solar initiative, August 08, 2012
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
I wonder, however, they are in some cases 2x more efficient...so, how much different is their price vs output compared to more traditional solar panels?
in other words, which one do I buy to put on my roof?