Solar panels suffer from one problem: the hotter they get, the less efficient they are. For something that sits out in the sun all the time, that can be a drawback. Simply put, a hotter solar collector will produce less electricity than one that is cooler. A photovoltaic (PV) panel loses about 0.5% efficiency for each degree Kelvin (or Centigrade) of temperature.
To deal with this, Solimpeks, a solar panel manufacturer in Turkey, is making hybrid solar panels that produce both electricity and hot water. With these hybrid panels, however, there is a double benefit. Not only is there the extra production of hot water with the same panels, but the removal of heat from the PV panels also increases their efficiency in generating electricity. Like an internal combustion engine that needs to be kept cooled in order to function, the hybrid solar panels use the hot water system as a radiator to help cool the photovoltaic panels.
Conecting these panels is likely to be somewhat more involved, since both electrical and plumbing connections need to be made. But the benefits offered by hybrid panels can definitely make it worthwhile.
link: Solimpeks

written by Ronald W. Gumbs, July 06, 2010
written by Johannes Hoek, July 06, 2010
It does not collect more energy. Every modules has a loss by cell heating (every 1 C degree, %0,5 loss) Hybrid panels decrease this loss by cooling down the cells. It seems that the advantage of Volther comparing with others is that you can use this hot water as well for heating house and the cooling down performance is good.
written by Garrett, July 06, 2010
Every little bit counts, love when two great sustainable technologies meet and fall in love, ha ha...
www.greencollarenvironmentalist.com
written by Steve A., July 06, 2010
written by sarah, July 07, 2010
written by Wouter, July 07, 2010
written by Brent T., July 15, 2010
In the summertime, keeping the panels at ~70C / 158F may be about the same as running the panels on an open rack. In the wintertime, the panels have to be heated to similar temperatures, i.e. seriously restrict the water flows, to get the output temperatures hot enough. The temperature differentials have to be more extreme if the inlet water is quite cold. And the hotter the panel, the less PV electricity is produced.
For heating of swimming pools, these systems may prove to be very effective. The cooler temperatures of a spa or swimming pool allows for the PV modules to run at lower temperatures, which allows for lower PV cell temperatures and more electric power.
In short, there is a trade off to such a system. To get the thermal temperatures hot enough for heat exchanging, the electrical output will be reduced. This may not be an issue as long as the salesmen state this upfront. And as already been previously mentioned, I would be nervous in guaranteeing any water-based plumbed system to truly last 30 years.
written by Eli Meyer, July 16, 2010
A closed loop system would require a huge reservoir to avoid overheating. The hotter your water reservoir gets, the less effective the system will be. The smaller your storage capacity is, the faster it will heat up. This is no problem if you have a swimming pool (or a pond) but these aren't often readily available.
This system seems like a great concept, but it is unlikely that this could ever prove cost effective for any commercial applications.
written by frisbee, July 17, 2010
PV solar creates low voltage. So I wouldn't think it would be much danger to keep it close to water. Besides of that most solar thermal installations use glycol or similar products instead of water to transport and transfer heat.
written by Randall Hodges, June 22, 2012
Anyway, my two cents. Now, someone go make a billion dollars on my suggestion! :-)
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
http://solarwall.com/en/home.php