Priligy online now, save money

JAN 25

Recent Comment

"This is winter number sixty for me. They have all been differant. When..."

View all Comments

Study: Decrease in Sun's Output Won't Curb Global Warming


A new study done by the University of generic viagra for women Reading and look there viagra profesional the Met Office looked at the http://visitkansascityks.com/online-levitra-prescriptions likely changes in solar activity over the next 90 years and whether a decrease would offset global warming by any significant measure.  The answer:  no.

The study found that the sun's output is likely to decrease until 2100, but that decrease will only lead to cialis overnite a global temperature reduction of 0.08 °C.  Compared to the forecasted warming of at least 2.5 °C over the same period from greenhouse gases, a solar activity decline doesn't get us very far.

The study found that even if the sun's output fell to it's lowest known levels that occurred between 1645 and 1715, global temperatures would still only be reduced by 0.13 °C.

While the study's authors concede that their model doesn't fully capture all of the uncertainties in the free levitra sample climate system and solar output, the results do certainly let us know that a decline in solar activity is no match for greenhouse gas emissions.

via Physorg

Hits: 11137
Comments (10)Add Comment
Huh?, Low-rated comment [Show]
0
Good point.
written by Fencerdave, January 25, 2012
Because without the presence of scientific records, we have no way of knowing anything about the past.

Here's a toast to getting rid of the world's biggest pieces of how to get cialis no prescription liberal propaganda:
Volcanoes,
Pangaea,
Dinosaurs,
Asteroids,
and that devil of devils, Evolution!
0
Garbage Science
written by Ronald Brak, January 26, 2012
Yes, this is roguelephant.com obviously junk science. Those filthy lying liers thought they could make us believe people had accurate measuring instruments back in 1645. Why I bet if I take the words 'reconstructions of historic total irradience' and spend just 5 minutes goolgling them, it will clearly show what huge liars they are!

Hmmm... It seems that there are a variety of accepted methods used to reconstruct the past output of the sun, and a lot of people have put a lot of hard work into this and have attempted to make the reconstructions as accurate as possible. It seems that I no longer have a reason to only for you mexico levitra no prescription feel smuggly superior for being smart enough to catch them in a lie. It's amazing what you can learn in five minutes of googling.
0
Simon
written by CNCMike, January 29, 2012
Obviously it should say Simple Simon
0
@Ronald
written by Simon, January 30, 2012
The Earth hasn't warmed at all over the last decade. FACT.

And yes, you are right, the reconstructions are junk science.
0
Hmmm...
written by Felicia , January 30, 2012
Just wondering if anyone who has commented has actually read the study? I am assuming no, so before you declare the robert-alonso-photos.com study to be "junk science", I suggest you read the study article, particularly the methods and discussion sections. Thank you.
0
Please Read...
written by JanS, January 31, 2012
Something about paleoclimate reconstruction!

Obviously some of visionwidget.com you have absolutely no clue what they are talking about, sorry guys!
I'm a geoscientist and I work on a Project that deals with the climate evolution in the last 12.000 years (the Holocene). The solar activity is regarded as one of the most influential climate forcings (influences on the climate).
Can you proof that? Probably not, but we search for models and explanations. Do you believe that the inner core of the earth consists of iron and buy cialis professional nickel? Nobody can really proof that but it's a model and as long as there is no proof against it, it will remain.
0
My thermometer must be broken
written by Ronald Brak, January 31, 2012
The earth hasn't warmed at all over the last decade and that's a fact? Actually, that's a lie. And it's still a lie even if you're just repeating what you've been told since it is so easy to check. Here's what NASA says:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/

Now here's the part where you say NASA is lying. Or maybe you'll just say that thermometers are unreliable. Personally, I think you'll go for NASA is lying, and so I will be forced to make a choice - who is more believable, you or NASA? But I think you will then follow it up by saying the data is unreliable, which would mean that it is impossible to state that there has been no warming, but I doubt that contradiction will worry you. Anyway, have fun!
0
The power of simple minds.
written by Sapoty Brook, February 03, 2012
Those earlier comments are a wonderful example of the power of simple minds to destroy our children's future.smilies/angry.gif
0
...
written by Walter R. Rice, February 03, 2012
This is winter number sixty for me. They have all been differant. When I was young, they talked about winter that would last forever. Now it is summer that lasts forever. Experts are wrong some times.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?




The Most Popular Articles