<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Solar Efficiency Record Broken</title>
		<description>Comments for Solar Efficiency Record Broken at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 10 out of 10 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:21:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-32333</link>
			<description>Sometimes a technology can be advanced long-term by a lateral movement. - compact fluorescent light</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:52:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DIY solar</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-18092</link>
			<description>why isn't PV sold at Home Depot anyway? anyway here's an open source project that's kind of fun:

http://www.solarnetwork.net/
 - solarnetwork</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:35:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Internet Delivers</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17775</link>
			<description>http://www.udel.edu/iec/Publications/DARPA_22nd_EUPVSEC.pdf - The internet</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:15:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hmm</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17774</link>
			<description>Wake me up when I can buy solar at home depot for less than $500 and it will power my house.  - Marc</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:54:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good to see continued development in sol</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17768</link>
			<description>Sometimes a technology can be advanced long-term by a lateral movement.  It might be easier to make even  more gains against a newer design.  I'm hoping you guys pickup more efficiency and make going solar truly cost-effective.   - Steve Jones</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:10:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nice</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17767</link>
			<description>Dude that is absolutely amazing! Once again you ahve hit the nail on the head!

JW
www.anondo.alturl.com - Jimmy Washington</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:46:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>If DARPA already did it ...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17763</link>
			<description>...then where the hell is it? One of the best inventions that we -really- need, which you say DARPA has &quot;done&quot;, and it's nowhere to be seen. - the english guy</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:32:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DARPA Already Did IT</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17762</link>
			<description>It's called PRISM, and they separated light to more sensitive PV cells.   - Faust</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:09:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Actually, could very very exciting</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17710</link>
			<description>Although little gain in efficiency.  The fact there is a whole different approach is a very cool development.  This allow for many more options for high-efficiency solar cells to come to market. - cameron</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:58:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hmm, not much gain</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2013#comment-17703</link>
			<description>So, basically, not much gain, developments, but nothing exciting.

-The Food Monster
http://thefoodmonsterblog.blogspot.com - The Food Monster</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:45:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
