
Here's some really exciting renewable energy news. Spain's Gemasolar concentrating solar power plant just became the first solar power plant to generate power for 24 continuous hours.
The plant uses a Power Tower design where a field of mirrors concentrate the sun's heat onto a boiler in the central tower. That boiler creates steam which turns a turbine. None of that is out of the ordinary when it comes to concentrated solar power, but the Gemasolar plant is the only one in the world to use molten salt as a heat transfer fluid, which allows for the storage and generation of electricity even once the sun goes down.
The 19.9 MW capacity plant on average is able to generate power for 20 hours a day and during the summer, many days will see 24 full hours of energy generation. The molten salt storage really makes a big difference here. Compared to the larger 21.2 MW Solarpark Calaveron plant that generates about 40 GWh per year, the Gemasolar plant generates almost triple that with 110 GWh per year.
Power storage is one of the major issues facing the growth of renewable energy generation. The wind isn't always blowing and the sun isn't always shining, but innovative storage solutions like the one at Gemasolar will be what turns renewable energy into not just a clean source of electricity but also a reliable one.
via Grist

written by Russell Cavanagh, July 06, 2011
written by Jeff, July 06, 2011
According to the U.S. EIA, in 2009 the average US household used 10,896 kWh. So, dividing 110 GWh (110,000,000 kWh) by 10,896 kWh gives 10,095 households.
This plant, however, is in Spain, and I'd guesstimate that the average Spaniard use a little less than half the amount of power that Americans do. So maybe it'll power 20,000 - 25,000 Spanish households.
written by Russell Cavanagh, July 07, 2011
written by omelay, July 07, 2011
written by haichen, July 07, 2011
written by Brent Whistler, July 07, 2011
written by Mukund (Mook) Bangalore, July 07, 2011
written by dialtone, July 08, 2011
written by Mike, July 09, 2011
written by PJD, July 15, 2011
I think you are probably overestimating the power consumption of keeping a pot of coffee warm by quite a bit.
Did you measure 900W with a meter or simply use the peak rating on the label. That peak number would be much higher than the amount drawn over a long period keeping the coffee warm.
Not that an insulated container isn't a better idea both from energy standpoint and keeping the coffee tasting better.
written by jcsr, August 26, 2011
written by ron, August 29, 2011
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
JUL 06
"I would rate this as a major break through for solar power...."
View all Comments