Priligy online now, save money

JAN 19

Recent Comment

"This article is classic mock journalism. IT is obvious that the author..."

View all Comments

The Photensity: PV, Solar Thermal, and Light Bulb All In One



BrightPhase Energy, a Denver-based startup, has created the cialis 100 solar equivalent of a one-man-band: The Photensity. Inside this square box, three different technologies are employed to harness sunlight. Firstly, 18% efficient silicon solar cells are mounted on a set of Venetian blinds to deliver PV electricity. Secondly, thin fluid-filled pipes absorb thermal energy which can be used to heat a house’s water supply. Finally, because the aforementioned blinds can be rotated to cialis at real low prices let in sunlight, the Photensity also “harnesses” sunlight by acting as a skylight during sunny hours (when there is no sun, it turns on an electric light).

All told, BrightPhase claims that after tallying up all of the energy that the Photensity provides – in terms of electricity, heat and click now buy cialis light – they calculate the cost at $1.80 per watt. Now, we know that any time we get a quote like that, it must be taken with a grain of salt, since there are a lot of assumptions that go into it. For example, since the Photensity allows sunlight in, it counts those lumens as energy generated. How do you translate lumens into watts? If you do so by using light bulbs as a standard, what kind of levitra sale buy light bulbs? If you’re basing the number on incandescent bulbs, it will in a sense inflate the wattage that the device is actually producing.

However, I’m less concerned about how the purchase cialis $1.80 is calculated and more concerned about how these devices will actually work. The Photensity aspires to be a replacement for a skylight, but it offers a lower-quality light than a skylight, since its light casts shadows of the solar modules. And it can only be applied to architecture that facilitates skylights – which means it can’t be used to retrofit, say, a large warehouse. And, reportedly, a trial in a California Wal-Mart revealed some issues with the functionality of the device itself.

What I wonder is: how much PV and thermal energy do you lose by incorporating the sunlight element? Is it really worth it? Or did BrightPhase simply find a way to report a lower cost-per-watt by incorporating the “wattage” of sunlight?

Via Greentech Media

Hits: 12168
Comments (2)Add Comment
0
Co-founder & EVP
written by Dave Buemi, April 14, 2009
I would be please to answer your questions at your convenience. Also, we have never done a demonstration with Wal-Mart.

Thanks,

Dave

0
Mock journalism
written by Carl Andrews, March 19, 2010
This article is classic mock journalism. IT is obvious that the author didn't bother to do any proper research on www.hasselaar.nl the product covered, and instead relied on hear-say and personal assumptions. For instance, skylights are often inefficient because they channel too MUCH light to saltlakewebcentral.com focused areas. Why do you think people but blinds over windows ? Having movable slats enables the Photensity to have more control over the quality of light delivered, not simply poor quality. I will leave it at that...

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?