Priligy online now, save money
Biofuels

Enhanced Plant Oil Production May Boost Biofuels

A new development using genes from algae to engineer plants to store oils in their leaves could lead to improvements in both biofuel production and the manufacture of animal feed. Researchers from Michigan State University have made plants with oily leaves, which were demonstrated when worms fed these leaves grew fatter than worms fed the unmodified version of the plants.

Most plant oils are stored in the seeds of the plant, and can be difficult to extract. But plants that store oils in their stems and leaves can be more easily processed to extract those oils. They also may produce greater quantities of oil than the original plants.

In addition to the potential use in biofuels, producing plants that store more oils in their leaves could also be a benefit for animal feed. Greater nutrition density from the same amount of crop could help feed more animals from the same area of cropland.

The lead scientist, MSU professor of biochemistry and molecular biology Christoph Benning, stated, "Many researchers are trying to enhance plants’ energy density, and this is another way of approaching it. It’s a proof-of-concept that could be used to boost plants’ oil production for biofuel use as well as improve the nutrition levels of animal feed."

Ongoing research will next move from demonstration of the concept to begin to explore specific applications "to enhance oil production in grasses and algae that have economic value."

image: by Rosendahl/Wikimedia Commons - Public Domain

 

Bacteria May Provide More Sustainable Biofuel Production

Biofuel, like many alternative energy sources that are on the rise, faces its share of criticism. While it sounds ideal to create fuel from plants rather than limited fossil fuels, many methods of producing biofuel come at a high environmental cost all their own. Land used for biofuel production, for example, could be better put to use growing consumable crops instead of “sustainable” power for our cars.

Although biofuels from wood or grass may have a better future than less sustainable sources like corn, they are much more difficult to produce. The first step in turning biomass from grasses, trees, and certain algae into biofuel is getting through lignin, the tough material of their cell walls, and the compound isn’t an easy one to break down.

However there are some bacteria that digest lignin quite well, and harnessing the chomping power of these microorganisms could eventually lead to easier and more sustainable biofuel creation. While researchers at Mississippi State University had focused on identifying the digestive bacteria in panda poop, researchers at Brown University are also studying microorganisms that can break down lignin--and have figured out the chemical switch to start the lignin digestive process in the bacteria Streptomyces.

One of the few microorganisms that can consume lignin, Streptomyces begins the digestion process by releasing enzymes to break lignin down into its constituent compounds. This lignin-derived carbon, which the bacteria uses for growth and reproduction, is also where the magic begins for biofuel production: Streptomyces converts some of it into triglycerides, essential components of biodiesel, as well as other useful compounds. The Brown researchers’ previous work showed which genes encode enzymes to break down one particular compound: protocatechuate. When Streptomyces was grown where protocatechuate was present, PcaV, a protein usually attached to the DNA that stops those genes clusters from encoding, lost its affinity for DNA--and those unblocked genes gave the green light for enzyme production.

While being able to kickstart the lignin digestion process could lead to an easier transformation of woody biomass into biofuel, producing biofuel through Streptomyces on a commercial scale is still a long way away. Nevertheless, this research is a step forward for bacteriology as well as sustainable bioenergy.

Image via Sello lab/Brown University

via: Inhabitat

 

Navy May Still Be Able to Sail Its "Great Green Fleet"

The US Navy is getting a reprieve from what looked like strong Congressional opposition to further use of biofuels in Navy vessels. Restrictions imposed this past May by Congress against the further use of biofuels by the Navy were recently repealed in the Senate.

The Navy has been testing the use of biofuels for the past few years, and this legislation makes it more likely that the Navy can continue to explore the use of biofuels with its fleets. The Navy's "Great Green Fleet" planned for 2016 may still be a viable possibility.

The top military leadership is generally in favor of green measures. The armed services have been adopting greater use of more sustainable materials, and they recognize the strategic importance of energy conservation and self-reliance for energy needs. As a whole, the US Department of Defense is the single largest single user of oil in the world, so developing more sustainable sources is beneficial to them strategically as well as reducing their environmental impacts.

image: Public Domain by US Navy/Wikimedia Commons

via: Wired.com Danger Room

 

Audi's Carbon Neutral E-Gas

Automakers have a strong interest in understanding and improving the fuel market. After all, without a stable fuel infrastructure in place, their products (the cars they build) are nothing more than big sculptures. So it's not surprising that Audi is involved in a carbon-neutral fuel called e-gas.

Working with an organic waste burning facility, CO2 is captured and then combined with electrolytically produced hydrogen (powered by clean energy sources like wind and solar) to create synthetic methane (which is natural gas). To use this fuel, Audi is building a dual-fuel car called the Audi A3 TCNG which can use either the e-gas or regular gasoline. The feedstock is non-food organic waste, to avoid competition between food and fuel. In addition to the e-gas, Audi is also producing e-diesel and e-ethanol, to provide cleaner fuels for the entire range of its engines.

This is not too different from any number of other biofuel manufacturers. And this is not the first time that an automaker has taken an interest in fuel manufacturing. (GM was an investor in Coskata, a biofuel startup that got a lot of attention in 2008.) The issue with this, and other, biofuel schemes is to make the entire process carbon neutral. Not only the fuel itself, but also the energy used in producing the fuel must all be clean or carbon neutral in order to be sustainable in the long term.

via: Jalopnik

 

Progress in Biofuels Production

We've been getting an onslaught of press releases from a number of companies all promoting their biofuel production facilities and the deals they are making to provide biofuels to various industries and markets. Numerous airlines and branches of the military have tested biofuels in their aircraft to verify it is safe to use. In many aspects, biofuels are a growing business.

However, despite the flurry of production, biofuels are still a long way from replacing conventional fossil fuels. While the numbers can be impressively large-sounding, these still represent only a tiny percentage of the total amount of fuel that is consumed by motor vehicles annually. The output from a pilot plant may sound impressively large if thinking about the volume of fuel in comparison to one's individual use. But when considered against the millions of vehicles on the road, it is completely dwarfed by the volume of fuel consumed annually (or even just daily) across the nation for transportation.

In addition, as part of the federal Renewable Fuel Standard, the EPA has recently set the annual production volume target for bio-based diesel at 1.28 billion gallons, a volume which is in line with current industry production and capacity. The EPA rule does not mandate a particular percentage of biofuel to be incorporated into diesel fuels, but instead is an amount that industry is required to accommodate. This serves to guarantee a place for biodiesel in the fuel mix and is part of the Energy Policy Acts of 1992 and 2005.

According to the EPA, this use of biodiesel offers benefits to the nation, noting that "[q]uantified estimates of benefits include $41 million in energy security benefits and $19-52 million in air quality disbenefits." Additionally, there are likely to be direct and indirect employment benefits and GHG emissions reductions.

Biofuels are not a silver bullet solution, however, and there are a number of drawbacks to many current forms of biofuel production. Unfortunately, many of the sources for biodiesel and ethanol are competing with food uses of land and are using food crops like corn and soybeans as feedstocks for fuel. Rainforest lands are also being cleared for plantations of sugarcane and jatropha that is being used for fuel. Despite these problems, in the long term, the growth of this industry can be useful in developing non-fossil fuels that can replace the current unsustainable fuel sources.

image: CC BY 2.0 by Steve Jurvetson/Wikimedia

 
Start   Prev   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next   End

Page 1 of 26

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?